UW study challenges long-held fire beliefsJul 22, 2012 The Associated Press
RENO, Nev. -- Scientists using field notes from surveys first conducted by the government before the Civil War believe they've gained a better understanding of how Western wildfires behaved historically.
Researchers at the University of Wyoming studied historical fire patterns across millions of acres of dry Western forests. Their findings challenge the current operating protocol of the U.S. Forest Service and other agencies that today's fires are burning hotter and more frequently than in the past.
Combing through 13,000 firsthand descriptions of forests and retracing steps covering more than 250 miles in three states, where teams of government land surveyors first set out in the mid-1800s to map the nation's wild lands, the researchers said they found evidence forests then were much denser than previously believed.
"More highly intense fire is not occurring now than historically in dry forests," said William Baker, who teaches fire ecology and landscape ecology in Laramie, Wyo., where he's been doing research more than 20 years. "These forests were much more diverse and experienced a much wider mixture of fire than we thought in the past, including substantial amounts of high-severity fire."
If he's right, he and others say it means fuel-reduction programs aimed at removing trees and shrubs in the name of easing fire threats are creating artificial conditions that likely make dry forests less resilient.
"It means we need to rethink our management of Western dry forests," said Baker, a member of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service working group that is developing plans to help bolster northern spotted owl populations in dry forests.
Baker's conclusions have drawn sharp criticism from other longtime researchers who believe that decades of fire suppression have led to more densely tangled forests and more intense fires, the position advanced by the Forest Service.
"I have yet to hear any knowledgeable forest or fire ecologist or forest manager say they are convinced by the main interpretations in that (Wyoming) paper," said Thomas Swetnam, a professor of dendrochronology and director of the Laboratory of Tree Ring Research at the University of Arizona.
"I doubt it will gain much traction in the scientific or management communities."
The Forest Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Baker said the historic government land surveys provided researchers with a surprisingly detailed and precise record.
The studies conducted by Baker and others over the past two years focused on parts of Colorado, Oregon and Arizona, but were indicative of dry forest types stretching from the Rockies to the Sierra Nevada previously thought to be "open and park-like" and typically enduring only cycles of frequent, low-severity fire.
"The major surprising finding was ... areas of high density of forest and higher severity fires in really all dry forests across the West," said Mark Williams, who co-authored two of the three studies with Baker.
"The notes are pretty descriptive," said Williams. "You can look for where the fire started and ended. We were actually walking the same lines, collecting fire scars from trees."
Wallace Covington, the director of the Ecological Restoration Institute at Northern Arizona University, takes no issue with the Wyoming duo's data collection or statistical analysis but said some of Baker's conclusions don't follow from his data.
Covington first testified before Congress in 2002 about the urgent need to thin forests to guard against catastrophic wildfires and insists it's still necessary.
Others say the Wyoming studies are important new information in an emerging field of research.